Attacking Jesus

Recently I have noticed that the attack on Jesus has become fore-front. It started with the DeVinci Code, witch I could have ignored as artistic license but the attack has become more frequent and more pointed.
Now they are saying that Jesus didn't walk on the water but walked on ice.

"The second “study” is more of an elastic theory. Some scientist has put forth the following as a possible theory to explain how Jesus may have “appeared” to have walked on water:

Rare conditions could have conspired to create hard-to-see ice on the Sea of Galilee that a person could have walked on back when Jesus is said to have walked on water.

So, not only was Jesus the son of God, but he could have been the world’s first hockey player as well?

If Jesus was in fact walking on ice, I would think that skeptics of the day would have been able to figure that one out. It’s amazing how far out some people will go to explain stories they may consider far out, often ending up farther out than the original far out. Make sense? Me neither."

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/04/04/study-churchgoers-live-longer/

What? My first question was what then did Peter walk on? Was he distracted by the rolling ice waves.

Now front and center is the Gospel of Judas trying again to challenge the diety of Christ. The manuscript is not Biblical and conflicts with doctrine. It paints Jesus as a false teacher. I believe this is a Satanic attempt to make Satan look better. The bible says that Satan entered Judas at the last supper.

I know this will continue and get worse before it gets better but God will triumph.